Zetasizer Sensitivity – for protein DLS

Minimum concentration calculator for any protein - Zetasizer Nano

How do I know the minimum concentration needed for measuring the size of my protein?

Zetasizer sensitivity is quite relvant for protein researchers. We are asked this question all the time when we are demonstrating the Zetasizer.  Happily, if the Zetasizer software is installed (and it can be downloaded for free, by the way) there is a minimum concentration calculator integrated – so it’s simple! The calculator is available in the software from Tools – Calculators – Concentration Utilities – Minimum Concentration Calculator

Let’s look at a few examples to get an idea of some typical values for your samples. The left hand column of the table below lists a typical range of protein molecular weights, extending from 3 kDa to 250 kDa, which covers the majority of typical protein samples except for small peptides and large proteins. An estimated size for each weight of protein, measured by DLS, is shown in the middle column (both radius [r.nm] and diameter [d.nm] in nano meters). The sensitivity in the right hand column, is the minimum concentration of the protein sample in mg/mL that you need in order to achieve a result within a reasonable measurement duration. These values are for a standard Zetasizer Nano ZS, and also apply to the Zetasizer APS, microV and ZSP models.  It really is as easy as 1, 2, 3!

Zetasizer-sensitivity-table

Access the online Calculator here.

How pure does my sample have to be ?

In principle, there is no requirement for protein samples for the Zetasizer to be highly purified. The main concern is that enough light reaches the detector so that we can reliably analyze the signal. If the sample is so aggregated that light scattered by the larger aggregates overshadows that scattered by the monomer, then this will most likely lead to disappointment. In such cases, some centrifugation or filtration may resolve the problem; alternatively, increasing the sample concentration may lead to improved result quality.

Minimum Zetasizer sensitivity for flow-mode

The sensitivity calculator in the Zetasizer software also includes a section titled “Flow-Mode”. The concentration given applies to a typical one-column SEC chromatography setup. (For example a Superdex 200 for the injection of 100 μL at the indicated concentration). For example for an antibody, an injection of 50 μg (100 μL * 0.5 mg/mL = 0.05 mg = 50 μg), see screen shot below. This would be valid for the Zetasizer microV, or Nano-S or Nano-ZSP when connected in flow mode to a chromatography system. Flow mode operation is also equivalent to the term ASEC (absolute size exclusion chromatography). Some also reference it as DLS (dynamic light scattering), QUELS (quasi-elastic light scattering) or PCS (photon correlation spectroscopy) in flow. We record both the hydrodynamic size and the scattering intensity of the eluting molecules, as peaks elute from the size exclusion chromatography system.

Flow-mode-sensitivity-for-antibody-zetasizer-asec

How about the S90 system?

Protein-sensitivity-backscatter-versus-90-degrees

The traditional 90 degree scattering optics in the Zetasizer S90 (and the ZS90) requires a higher concentration  in order to receive significant scattering intensity to acquire repeatable dynamic light scattering data. The minimum concentration calculator is  also useful to find this sensitivity. Below is an example of a typical relationship for a protein close to the size of an antibody. The required concentration in the S90 is higher. And that is why most protein researchers prefer the backscattering optics.

How about the sensitivity for zeta potential measurements on my protein?

The same calculator is also useful to find the minimum concentration to perform an electrophoretic mobility measurement. As an example, for an antibody the approximate concentrations are to the right. About 2 mg/mL for the Zetasizer Nano Z/ZS and about 0.1 mg/mL for the Zetasizer Nano ZSP.

PS: Historical malvern.com/calculator available online (via wayback)

Previously

If you have any questions, please email me at ulf.nobbmann@malvern.com. Thanks! Opinions are generally those of the author. But our editorial team may have modified some parts.