Top 6 Reasons To Consider Zeta Potential

Why is Coagulation Dose control important?

Turbidity and NOM in the source water feeding a drinking water purification plant, particularly a surface water source, fluctuates over time. This continual change may require adjustment to the coagulant dose, pH or polymer addition to enable the flocculation process to work efficiently. Careful management of the coagulant dose with accurate and timely monitoring can impact the overall plant performance. Monitoring this based on zeta potential, a scientific measurement of the electrical potential charge between particles, provides reliable and relevant data. Particle charge neutralization is needed to enable a strong floc to form and allow the entire process to run smoothly.   Here are the top 6 reasons to consider a laboratory zeta potential system for coagulation dose control.

1. Zeta Potential is a scientifically proven technique.

Zeta Potential measures the charge of the particles that need to be filtered. Large particle will tend to settle on their own, so it is the small particles that are in stable suspension and require some assistance to flocculate for filtration to be effective. Zeta potential is a first principle measurement technique (no calibration) of the particle charge, reported in mV. Raw water particles are typically in a zeta potential range of -15mV to -25mV. A good floc can form in the Zeta potential range of -8mV to +3mV. Adding coagulants (which are positively charged) neutralizes the repulsive (negative) charge of the particles in the raw water and enables a strong floc to form.

2. Zeta Potential can provide reliable quantitative data to plant operators for coagulant dosing.

While there are many types of sensors and meters available, for both lab and online monitoring, the need for quick quantitative results to enable chemical dose determination is critical. Zeta potential can be used to monitor the incoming raw water just after coagulant addition and rapid mix, and provide the information needed to adjust the coagulant dose accordingly. Driving the dose to a range of zeta potential that works best for the particular plant and chemical use, gives operators a target based on quantitative data.

3. Zeta Potential outperforms other devices typically used to monitor the pre-treatment process:

Many operators use zeta potential to confirm the dosage is correct by analyzing the particle charge itself, rather than relying on other techniques like jar testing, turbidity or streaming current. These techniques are not able to effectively measure the charge of the particles and it is this charge that is the most important factor in building a filterable floc.

• Streaming Current – Streaming current devices tend to drift and often require re-calibration and are not sensitive to raw water quality effecting the dose needed.
  
• Turbidity Meter – this is not a measurement of charge and cannot effectively offer a guide for dose control.
• Jar Testing – again, not a charge measurement, but also very subjective based on user, requires time for sampling, testing and reporting.
• Zeta Meter – this is a device that attempts to measure zeta potential manually, requiring the operator to record time movements via a microscope. Very difficult to attain repeatable results, time consuming and very subjective.

4. The ROI from a lab Zetasizer can be significant.

Flashy raw water, multiple raw water sources, storm events and seasonal effects all contribute to the need for a reliable and fast monitoring system to provide scientific data to the operators so dosage can be correctly adjusted. Environmental impacts, such as mud slides and wildfires can be overwhelming to operators that are fighting to keep the plant operational. Blindly overdosing coagulant is wasting time and at a huge cost, which municipal budgets can no longer absorb. When employing zeta potential monitoring, typical savings are documented to be about 21%-36%. Considering the annual cost of coagulant chemicals used in a typical plant, the savings can have a valuable impact on the plants operating budget. Reported ROI for a Malvern Panalytical Zetasizer Lab Blue system is under 8 months. Another savings is in the disposal of sludge, which can be reduced with better coagulant dose control and can add savings of about 10% of disposal costs, contributing to the value of using zeta potential as a charge monitoring solution.

5. Zeta Potential monitoring for exact coagulant dosing improves filter run times and reduces corrosion risk. 

Zeta potential provides a measured value that indicates the exact amount of coagulant dosing needed for optimal coagulation, reduced overdosing. Overdosing is not only a chemical cost issue, but also more importantly a plant performance issue. Overdosing leads to shorter filter run times. Overdosing is also the biggest contributing factor to corrosion. Coagulant overdosing changes pH and alkalinity, increasing the risk of corrosion in the water distribution, particularly during rain events. Overdosing is unnecessary risk and cost for a water treatment plant.

6. The Zetasizer Lab Blue system is from Malvern Panalytical

For more than 60 years Malvern Panalytical has been a trusted supplier to scientists and engineers in a wide range of industries and organizations to solve the challenges associated with maximizing productivity, developing better quality products and getting them to market faster. Within Malvern Panalytical’s portfolio of technologies, the Zetasizer is a world class instrument supported by years of academic and industrial use, with a huge following and thousands of application-driven publications.  Its use in the water treatment market has been ongoing for over 15 years. Our technical expertise on zeta potential brings the use of zeta potential to a new standard for water treatment plants.